Government of J&K
Citizen Centric Services J&K
Generally no, unless original is unavailable.
Yes, if authorship is otherwise proved.
Depends on stamp laws; may be inadmissible.
Generally no, certificate is required.
Rarely, direct evidence usually prevails.
Court weighs credibility and consistency.
Court may still use parts of testimony.
Yes, for perjury.
Yes, through summons.
Court may issue warrant or impose fine.
Yes, they are entitled to reasonable fees.
Yes, if not tampered and properly proved.
Yes, if authenticity is established.
Yes, except in cases where law shifts it.
Truth must be discovered through fair and reliable evidence.
Yes, it applies throughout India.
From 1st July 2024.
The Parliament of India.
To set rules on admissibility and relevancy of evidence.
Yes, it applies to all proceedings after enforcement.
Yes, digital records have been given major focus.
Yes, if verified.
Yes, they are admissible as electronic records.
Yes, with proper certification.
Yes, if proved authentic.
Its evidentiary value may be weakened.
Yes, if verified as genuine.
Only if proven genuine and not manipulated.
Only if authenticity is established.
They verify electronic and scientific evidence.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, they are valid.
Yes, if proven genuine.
Yes, with certification.
Yes, with authenticity proof.
Yes, if unreliable or tampered.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, but court will weigh legality and reliability.
Yes, they can show access history.
Yes, if recovered and verified.
Yes, by restricting irrelevant or intrusive evidence.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, under expert opinion.
Yes, as electronic evidence.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, they are public documents.
Yes, if presented lawfully.
Yes, as official documents.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, as official documents.
Yes, as evidence of death.
Yes, as identity and residence proof.
Yes, as identity evidence.
Yes, as public document.
Yes, it is strong identity proof.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, as documentary evidence.
They may be admissible but with lesser weight.
No, they lose evidentiary value.
Secondary evidence can be given.
No, original must be produced unless exceptions apply.
Yes, as secondary evidence.
Yes, they are valid.
Yes, if verified.
Yes, under electronic evidence.
Yes, with certification.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, if proved genuine.
Only if authenticity is proved.
Yes, though old, they are admissible.
Yes, with certification.
Yes, as electronic record.
Yes, it is admissible.
Yes, it can be seized and used.
Yes, if collected lawfully.
Yes, by expert cross-examination.
Yes, their reliability can be questioned.
Not directly; they need consent and are unreliable.
Not as substantive evidence.
Not admissible unless voluntary.
Yes, but with less reliability.
Yes, if verified.
Yes, as expert evidence.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, as a public document.
Yes, but it is not proof of guilt.
Not as substantive evidence, only for contradictions.
Yes, it is admissible.
Yes, but court checks credibility.
Difficult, as header proves source.
No, unless linked to accused.
Yes, they play a big role.
Yes, for evidence collection.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, if recovered and verified.
Yes, if authenticity is established.
Yes, with certification.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, unless protected under privilege.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, it is admissible.
No, except for limited purposes.
Yes, if it causes self-incrimination.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, court may restrict disclosure.
Yes, to protect sensitive evidence.
No, law protects her identity.
Yes, to protect the child.
Yes, to protect privacy.
Yes, court may safeguard it.
Yes, BSA permits it.
Yes, courts allow it.
Yes, but only if law permits.
No, unless law specifically allows.
They are admissible but not proof of facts stated.
Yes, if verified.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, if obtained from official sources.
Yes, as certified public documents.
Yes, with authenticity proof.
Yes, with forensic help.
Yes, if linked to the user.
Yes, if authentic.
Yes, with verification.
Yes, if genuine.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, if relevant and verified.
Yes, with blockchain records.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, with certification.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, as supporting evidence.
Yes, they are documentary evidence.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as documentary evidence.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as public document.
Yes, it is admissible.
Yes, as official records.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as business documents.
Yes, for identification.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, as official records.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, as electronic evidence.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, it is admissible.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as documentary evidence.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as supporting documents.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as supporting proof.
Yes, to prove presence at a place.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, if reliable.
Yes, if relevant and authenticated.
Yes, if verified.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, to prove presence or timing.
Yes, as electronic records.
Yes, as electronic evidence.
Yes, as public records.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, it is valid evidence.
Yes, they are admissible.
Yes, if proved genuine.
Yes, they carry evidentiary value.
Yes, but weaker than notarized.
Yes, if properly executed.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, as admissible documents.
Yes, as official documents.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, as expert evidence.
Yes, as public records.
Yes, if certified.
Yes, as contracts.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, bank memo is admissible.
Yes, with records.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, though outdated.
Yes, they are equally valid.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as proof of intimidation.
Yes, if authorship is proved.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, as supporting evidence.
Yes, if proved.
Yes, if relevant.
Yes, as documents.
Yes, if proved.
Yes, to prove customs.
Yes, if relevant to custom.
Yes, if authenticated.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, but court will check reliability.
Yes, but court checks reliability.
Yes, if legally obtained.
Yes, but court examines legality.
Yes, if relevant and not violating law.
Court may accept, but legality affects weight.
No, they are not conclusive.
No, not admissible as evidence.
No, it lacks evidentiary value.
Yes, if properly certified.
Yes, they are strong evidence.
Yes, highly reliable evidence.
Yes, their opinion is admissible.
Yes, by experts or court itself.
Yes, for authenticity.
Yes, their testimony is valid.
Yes, as expert witnesses.
Yes, they are valid evidence.
Yes, as expert evidence.
Yes, essential for electronic evidence.
Yes, if verified.
Yes, as scientific evidence.
Yes, if officially maintained.
Yes, if relevant and certified.
Yes, as identification.
Yes, for identity and residence proof.
Yes, as ID proof.
Yes, as public document.
Yes, as identification.
Yes, if issued by authority.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, strong proof of birth.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, strong legal proof.
Yes, as court records.
Yes, as valid evidence.
Yes, as public documents.
Yes, to interpret laws.
Yes, as public records.
Yes, they are conclusive proof.
Yes, if relevant and authenticated.
Yes, if origin is verified.
Yes, as part of investigation.
Yes, as medical records.
Yes, strong medical proof.
Yes, as documentary proof.
Yes, as medical evidence.
Yes, strong expert evidence.
Yes, strong proof.
Yes, as public records.
Yes, as official documents.
Yes, as public record.
Yes, but not proof by themselves.
No, except in limited use.
Yes, as judicial records.
Yes, as conclusive proof.
Yes, as judicial records.
Yes, as legal documents.
Yes, if recorded by court.
Yes, if recognized by Indian law.
It is the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, which controls and punishes drug-related activities.
It came into force on 14 November 1985.
To curb drug abuse, trafficking, and regulate medical use.
Narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, and certain controlled chemicals.
Yes, it applies throughout India and to Indians abroad.
Police, Customs, Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), etc.
To prevent drug misuse and regulate scientific/medical use.
Yes, even consumption is punishable.
Yes, except bhang in some states.
Yes, if misused or without valid prescription.
Possession, consumption, cultivation, trafficking, financing, or abetment.
Yes, depending on the quantity.
Yes, with strict penalties.
Yes, unless licensed by the government.
Yes, without authorization.
Yes, under Section 27A NDPS Act.
Helping or encouraging another to commit an offence.
Yes, attempts are treated as offences.
Yes, conspiracy itself is an offence.
Yes, though addicts may be sent for treatment.
Up to 1 year imprisonment or fine or both.
10–20 years imprisonment and heavy fine.
Up to 10 years jail and fine.
Quantities are notified separately for each drug.
Large amounts notified by the government.
10–20 years jail and fine up to ₹2 lakh or more.
Yes, for serious offences.